Skip to main content

Featured Post

The Making of a Dumb Datum

Imagine 10,000 years in the future. Two archaeologists are digging a site, and they find the remains of human bones. They take those remains to the lab, perform tests on them, and try to reconstruct the habits and lifestyle of that human. Say those bones belong to me. They are trying to find out my story, how I lived, what I ate, where I traveled, etc. Once they find all the info they need, they toss it into a museum where they store all other such ancient human remains they find. I was essentially one data point to them in trying to understand how humanity evolved over time. Or I can also call myself a “datum”, the singular form of data, literally one piece of information to solve a bigger puzzle. Honestly, I don’t need 10,000 years to become a datum. I am already a part of several datasets people use these days to study many things. So for that objective learner, I am already a datum. Now let me get to how I got the dumb part of it. I have had an interesting and eventful life so far...

Light of God

I have always been fascinated by light. It started with all the Hindu Mythological media I used to consume as a kid. God always had a bright halo of light behind him, and that enabled this idea in my head that light is a sacred thing. And later on, since I was a curious kid, I used to stare intensely at bright street lights while clutching on to my father’s shirt, sitting on the back of his motor cycle. In my head it was a stare down contest with God, but it probably was just the precursor needed to trigger my hidden superpower of double vision (or Astigmatism, as it is called in the scientific terms, which resigned me to wearing eye glasses with high power for rest of my life).

Now as a fully grown adult, I am grateful that my contests with God are limited to relevance of religion and purpose of human life, both of which don’t require staring into the street light from my balcony.

But roughly six months ago, a friend asked me if I know the reason why sunsets are red. I told him I didn’t. In a mocking tone, he asked me, “what were you doing in school?” I couldn’t tell him that I was busy starting at light rays, but anyways, that sent me into a rabbit hole of reading about the science behind light.

I started from the middle school level of “what is a wave?”, and then built up to concepts like electromagnetic waves, reflection, refraction, all such fundamental stuff I never paid attention to school. At one point, I started putting spoons in glass of water to notice how refraction seems to produce a broken image of spoon in water. A few weeks after that, I was surfing reddit and got pulled into a random conversation in the comments section under a reddit thread with a stranger, who asked me to read about the Parallax effect and Snell’s window. They were very simple concepts, but I remember the joy I had after reading about them, it was as if I had finally discovered God in something mundane.

But light has become bit of a boring topic for me lately, so I downgraded its priority in my reading shelf. I mean, yeah, light and electromagnetic waves have so many amazing applications. They enable modern communication systems, including the internet I am currently consuming to post this. They are also changing the way humans move; I see Waymo moving on streets everyday due to the LIDAR technology, which fires millions of lasers every second in environment to track the objects around it. All of these applications are revolutionary, but they do not feel very shocking to me.

But I read something today, which made me spring up from chair and start typing this. Apparently, researchers could introduce genes encoding light sensitive proteins into brain to achieve targeted firing of neurons. If this technology is correctly developed, it could literally change the way we see and perceive the world. Not figuratively, literally. If scientists can override certain neural circuits in my brain and fire the other ones they want to, they maybe able to change my thoughts and opinions. They may finally make me say yogurt is better than ice cream without lying. But of course, I am exaggerating things here like I usually do, but this is a fascinating area of study with so many positive implications for humanity

This field is called Optogenetics, and three researchers who played a crucial role in developing the ideas behind it - Karl Deisseroth, Peter Hegemann, and Georg Nagel, were jointly awarded the 2026 Nobel prize in physiology or medicine. It all started with Hegemann noticing an algae swimming towards sunlight, and becoming curious about how a single-celled organism like that was able to sense the light. So, this human quality of paying attention to things and becoming insanely curious is still making a difference to this world, which is great to know.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is SUTVA for A/B testing?

Imagine if person B’s blood pressure reading depends on whether person A receives the blood pressure medicine in a randomized controlled trial. This will be violating Stable Unit Treatment Value Assumption (SUTVA) SUTVA states that the treatment received by an individual should not influence the outcome we see for another individual during the experiment. I know the initial example sounded absurd, so let me try again. Consider LinkedIn A/B testing a new ‘dislike’ reaction for its users, and the gods of fate chose you to be part of the initial treatment group that received this update. Excited after seeing this new update, you use this dislike reaction on my post and send a screenshot to a few of your connections to do the same, who are coincidentally in the control group that did not receive the update. Your connections log in and engage with my posts to use this dislike reaction, but later get disappointed as this new update is not yet available to them. The offices of LinkedIn are tr...

Solving Customer Churn with a hammer!

Learning when data should take a back seat and give way to domain knowledge is a valuable skill. Suppose you built a machine learning model on the data of your customers to predict churn risk. Now that you have a risk score for each customer, what do you do next? Do you filter the top n% based on the risk and send them a coupon with a discount in the hopes that it will prevent churn? But what if price is not the factor driving churn in many of these customers? Customers might have been treated poorly by customer service, which drove them away from your company's product.  Or there might have been an indirect competitor's product or service that removes the need for your company's product altogether (this happened to companies like Blockbuster and Kodak in the past!) There could be a myriad of factors, but you get the point! Dashboards and models cannot guide any company's strategic actions directly. If companies try to use them without additional context, more often tha...

Curing writer's block with sunk cost fallacy

I paid $20 to renew this blog's domain in July. But the truth is, I had been suffering from writer's block ever since the start of this year and hadn’t posted a single thing. At one point, I was ready to give up on the blog altogether, but a voice in my head kept reminding me of all the time and money I’d already invested in this blog. So, this week, I sat down to write this imperfect, patchy article—about none other than that voice itself.  Let me start with a classic scenario where you might have also encountered this voice. Suppose you’re at an Italian restaurant and ordered some pasta and tiramisu. After finishing the pasta, you realize you’re full, and there’s no way your stomach can handle that delicious tiramisu sitting right in front of you. But then, that beautiful brain of yours reminds you that you’ll be paying for the tiramisu whether you eat it or not. In a desperate attempt to avoid wasting money, you reluctantly eat two quick bites. And just like that, my frien...